I was looking forward to participating in the community garden project with Mary Petit. The idea was for community members to care for a cooperative garden to grow organic vegetables to share with others and the poor. Growing vegetables on private property may now be a crime! Go figure…
The garden project, initiated by San Antonio Heights resident and avid gardener Mary Petit in February, has caused quite an uproar among residents near the proposed garden location at 24th Street and Mountain Avenue.
Petit’s community garden is intended to be used by local gardeners and families to grow vegetables, herbs and edible flowers to be donated to families in need.
“In my wildest dreams I never expected this type of reaction,” Petit said. “I certainly expected questions and concerns and would have addressed them all or at least attempted to address them all.”
The residents spoke at Monday evening’s City Council meeting, citing concerns about possible increases in wildlife, people, traffic and noise from construction on the property.
The smell of recently dumped manure on the land was mentioned by every resident who spoke.
In response, the council agreed to send city officials to the site at 7 a.m. Tuesday to prevent the project from moving forward.
“They put in a big water main and have been doing grading without a grading permit,” Mayor John Pomierski said. “You can’t do something like that when you have all kinds of people on your property with traffic in and out without a conditional use permit. None of that was applied for.”
Petit had been meeting with city officials concerning permit approval for the community garden.
However, the other work being done on the property was assumed by residents to be for her garden project.
“I met with them a couple of times last week and I think by the last meeting they understood it was going to take some time to go through a formal approval process to have a garden considered at that location,” said Jeff Bloom, the city’s community development director.
The Pfister family owns the property and decided to give Petit a portion of the land to support the project for a $1-a-year lease.
“It’s my understanding that the private land owner is well within his right to put his own personal garden on the property,” Petit said. “Part of it was for the garden to accommodate some of our needs and part of it was for his own private use.”
Mike Pfister said he was surprised to hear about the opposition from residents during Monday’s City Council meeting, but did not want to comment until he has time to review the meeting video.
Pfister did say the project will be on hold until the city gives him the OK to move forward.
“Mr. Pfister had already ordered a delivery of some soil or mulch to help with the garden and that got delivered thinking they were originally OK to go ahead,” Bloom said. “They still had equipment out there they still had to remove. He’s cooperating with us right now.”
Petit passed out fliers in the neighborhood to inform residents of the project’s details and to invite them to participate. She also held two meetings.
Bloom says her efforts to inform the neighbors could have triggered miscommunication in the neighborhood.
“It looked like they shut the whole thing down before we were given a chance to go through due process to describe what was being done,” Petit said. “A lot of the comments that I heard that were made at the City Council meeting and comments that were made to me when I was in that neighborhood was a lot of misinformation and unfortunately the neighbors that did confront me did not want to give me a chance to talk about it with them.”
To get approval from the city, Petit and those supporting her efforts will have to create a layout and plan for the garden and go through a public hearing.
“The concept of a garden, of course, is a good one,” Bloom said. “The problem they had is in the open space zone it required an approval process to do a public garden and they jumped the gun a little and didn’t anticipate that is what they would have to do. If they are going to pursue it on that 24th Street property they would have to go through the city’s approval process.”